Hal Higdon and his wife Rose will be traveling through Egypt and Israel from March 7 through March 27. In addition to our regular Tuesday Q&A postings, we will be hosting Hal's updates from his travels on this blog, under the tag "Egypt".
Rose claims that all of the temples have begun to merge in her mind. She no longer can tell apart the sculpted images of gods with heads male and female and of animals and the hieroglyphics between and whether the massive block of granite was carved by Rameses II, who seems to be responsible for half the art in Egypt or did it come out of the Ptolemaic age and what about the hieroglyphics, their message and meaning, and I am going to submit to you--and I susect that Rob our peerless leader would agree--that it doesn't make any difference.
It is simply great Egyptian art, so accept it at that level and do not try to put a name or a date on it.
Anyway, it s early on a morning--Friday, I think--and we pushed off from the deck and Endu a half hour ago and yesterday we visited the temple at Kom Ondu, or some such name, but we didn't visit the cattle market, but that is a rather a long strory involving security issues, and the sun rising above the East bank of the aisle is in my eyes and this laptop has Arabic letters instead of English, plus the chair I'm sitting on is too low and two soft, but I am going to tell you the lesson of the chicken hawk.
Rob said in his lecture yesterday that when he visits a friend in South Dakota, near where he was born, they often drive past a certain ridge, and the friend will say, "There's that damn chicken hawk." But, of course, it is not the same chicken hawk as the year before. There is a chicken hawk, but it is a different chicken hawk and was the year before that and the year before that and maybe all the way back to the time of the pharaohs. It is enough that there is a chicken hawk, and whether the animal has a name or an identity may not matter.
And it is the same with Egyptian art.
There were, according to the most frequently cited organizational chart, three kingdoms, each with intermediate periods between them, and 31 dynasties and a couple of hundred pharaohs, or kings if you prefer that term, and they are all the same and they are all different. But unless you are an Egyptologist and studying for a degree which will allow you to work for some great museum, it doesn't make any difference. You simply need to relax and enjoy the art, such as the vultures on the ceiling at whatever temple it was we saw yesterday and to note that they are colored--red and blue--not the black and white that we see pictured in books, and isn't that right.
Beginning around the time of the Great Pyramids of Cheops and ending just before Cleopatra sat on the throne and the Romans came in and changed everything, it took the Egyptians about 2500 years to perfect their art. Twenty-five hundred years of chicken hawks in the skies over what would be named South Dakota and that many years of wokers banging away with chisels on blocks of granite that took Herculean efforts to quarry and move and tens of thousands or maybe hundreds of thousands of workers who were not slaves but were employed because they wanted to carve statues and maybe contribute to their mortality and hte mortality of their masters, but more important the immortality of MISR, Egypt, and they got it right.
Consider the fact that in the Renaissance there was only one Leonardo da Vinci who produced a single Mona Lisa, and one Michelangelo who produced a single David statue and one Brunaleschi who unless my memory of Jean Vincent's Art History class is flawed, produced a single St. Peter's, but Egypt has thousands of works of art which whether or not they all look the same are equally as good, right up there with the Renaissance, maybe higher than art of that era, and all this is good and all that is the reason I am on a cruise ship contributing much needed currency to an economy that is stressed following the Revolution. Egyptian art is the le plus ultra of everything I leared in Miss Vincent's class, even if I try to connect it to a chicken hawk flying above a ridge in South Dakota.
I could continue with my theory of why we should not try to read hieroglyphics, but instead accept them as the splatter of paint on a Jackson Pollock canvas, beautiful as much from their pattern as for what they contribute to our knowledge of the three kingdoms and 31 dynasties, but we are cruising down the river toward Luxor, and I must go.
Flickr
LinkedIn
YouTube
RSS